-
Recent Posts
Archives
Tags
- argumentation
- circumcison
- culture
- damned lies and statistics
- direct democracy
- don't try this at home
- double effect
- doubt
- Europe
- faith and reason
- Fourier analysis
- fun
- Gerhard Ludwig Müller
- German reunification
- Greece
- Grundgesetz
- history
- homo factus est
- Ideological Turing Test
- I have a question
- Judaism
- judicial review
- lit
- liturgy
- Maths and intuition
- Meta
- metaphysics
- methodological nit-picking
- morality
- Morning After Pill
- Other people's insights
- politics
- probability models
- Quantum mechanics
- religious freedom
- sex
- silly internet memes
- slippery slopes
- St. Hypotheticus drinking and nerdery club
- surely something wrong here
- theological infighting
- totalitarianism
- triumphalism
- weird personality quirks
- Yudkowskyanism
Category Archives: Arguments
The problem with probabililities without models
Scott Alexander writes in defense of probabilities without models. I denied the possibility of this before, also in the context of Scott’s steel-manning of Yudkowskyanism, but back then the focus of the discussion was slightly different. So this is a … Continue reading
Assumptions behind a curtain
This is basically an overly long response to a recent blog post by Scott Alexander. It’s not very interesting outside of that context, so read that first unless you did so already. Also, most of this is further simplification of … Continue reading
Posted in Arguments
Tagged argumentation, damned lies and statistics, methodological nit-picking
7 Comments
Models as filthy water
[I was planning on this main metaphor before that other filthy water metaphor shook the Catholic blogosphere. Absolutely no reference intended.] When journalists asked Konrad Adenauer, the first post-war German chancellor, why his foreign office had so many employees who … Continue reading
The disappointing rightness of Scott Alexander
It turns out that Scott Alexander is even smarter than I thought. This is somewhat disappointing. Perhaps I should slow down on explaining that? The proof of his smartness is of course in agreeing with me. On his blog he … Continue reading
Oversimplification by Catholic cardinals and atheist bloggers
Atheist blogger JT Eberhard has a piece accusing the Catholic Church of supporting the Pinochet regime in Chile. This is somewhat surprising given the conventional wisdom is that the Chilean Catholic Church under Cardinal Silva basically ran what little internal … Continue reading
Posted in Arguments
Tagged argumentation, don't try this at home, history, politics, surely something wrong here
Comments Off on Oversimplification by Catholic cardinals and atheist bloggers
More on the uselessness of sex ed
Update: Yvain, who unlike me knows what he’s talking about, takes a somewhat more nuanced position and I infest his combox. This is basically a response to a comment that got so long I made it a post. In my last … Continue reading
Relevance considered harmful
Third in a series about doubt, rationalization, being mean while debating, and a problem with the empirical assessment of the effectiveness of arguments. Before I go on with the main argument, I’d like to go a little meta. A discussion … Continue reading
The counter-productiveness of mockery
Second in a series about doubt, rationalization, being mean while debating, and a problem with the empirical assessment of the effectiveness of arguments. In my last post I explained how I used to struggle with my faith a lot more … Continue reading
Euthanasia update
Back in January I had a post on some Dutch Euthanasia statistics that were making the rounds in the blogosphere at the time. Basically the claim was that the rates of Euthanasia and assisted suicide in jurisdictions allowing them were … Continue reading
Posted in Arguments
Tagged damned lies and statistics, slippery slopes
Comments Off on Euthanasia update