-
Recent Posts
Archives
Tags
- argumentation
- circumcison
- culture
- damned lies and statistics
- direct democracy
- don't try this at home
- double effect
- doubt
- Europe
- faith and reason
- Fourier analysis
- fun
- Gerhard Ludwig Müller
- German reunification
- Greece
- Grundgesetz
- history
- homo factus est
- Ideological Turing Test
- I have a question
- Judaism
- judicial review
- lit
- liturgy
- Maths and intuition
- Meta
- metaphysics
- methodological nit-picking
- morality
- Morning After Pill
- Other people's insights
- politics
- probability models
- Quantum mechanics
- religious freedom
- sex
- silly internet memes
- slippery slopes
- St. Hypotheticus drinking and nerdery club
- surely something wrong here
- theological infighting
- totalitarianism
- triumphalism
- weird personality quirks
- Yudkowskyanism
Category Archives: Arguments
A few words about archbishop Müller
A reader wrote in to ask my opinion about Gerhard Ludwig Müller, who used to be the bishop of Regensburg and, a few days ago, was appointed prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. The background is … Continue reading
What’s a secular argument?
Many people believe everyone supporting a policy should have a secular reason to do so. Deferring, for the moment, the question if that is a sensible expectation, I wonder how we decide whether an argument is secular. I acknowledge one … Continue reading
Slippery slopes, statistics and the telephone game
Leah Libresco of Unequally Yoked recently told her readers: In statistical news, social scientists have not found any evidence of doctor assisted suicide launching us down a slippery slope. The rates of people electing medically-assisted suicide has stayed flat in Oregon and … Continue reading
Posted in Arguments
Tagged damned lies and statistics, methodological nit-picking, slippery slopes
Comments Off on Slippery slopes, statistics and the telephone game